EPA issues rule on pollution from Off Road Vehicles
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recently issued a
proposed rule to reduce air pollution from snowmobiles, dirt bikes and
all-terrain vehicles (ATVs). This proposal sets weak standards -
especially for snowmobiles - and will not substantially reduce air and
noise pollution from off-road vehicles unless strengthened
significantly. To make matters worse, during recent public hearings in
Washington and Denver, the off-road industry presented a united front
opposing the proposal as too stringent, and made it clear it would
submit "many, many comments" to keep the rule as weak and ineffective at
curtailing pollution caused by their vehicles. Contact the EPA today
- to urge the agency to create a strong rule that
results in a meaningful cut in harmful air and noise pollution from
these machines.
Dirty Machines - Dirt bikes, ATVs and snowmobiles are a major source of
air and noise pollution nationwide. Most of these machines are powered
by antiquated two-stroke engines that burn a combination of gas and oil.
According to the EPA, the average two-stroke dumps 25 to 30 percent of
its fuel unburned into the air and water. The California Air Resources
Board concluded that operating a two-stroke motor for about 7 hours
generates as much smog-forming pollution as driving a modern car more
than 100,000 miles. The EPA estimates that dirt bikes, snowmobiles and
ATVs alone produce 10 percent of all hydrocarbon pollution from vehicles
nationwide. Air pollution from these machines also threatens public
health and has been directly linked to respiratory disease, cancer and
premature death.
Polluting Public Lands - Off-road vehicles are a major source of
pollution on public lands. In Yellowstone National Park, although cars
outnumber snowmobiles 16 to 1, snowmobiles produce as much as 68% of the
Park's annual carbon monoxide pollution and up to 90% of all hydrocarbon
emissions. The average dirt bike traveling across BLM lands in the west
generates 8 times as much air pollution as the average car. Pollution
controls are also needed because these machines are impairing visibility
in national parks, wilderness areas and other public lands across the
country.
Weak Proposal - The EPA has taken a step in the right direction by
proposing to reduce pollution from these machines - a step that's long
overdue. However, the proposal issued on September 14 falls far short
because:
- It fails to encourage a rapid transition from dirty two-stroke to
cleaner, more fuel-efficient four-stroke engines, especially in
snowmobiles.
- It fails to address noise pollution from machines that are as loud as
a busy street and whose noise has a scientifically proven detrimental
effect on wildlife.
- It does not include a labeling system that would give consumers
user-friendly information about emissions to help them make more
informed choices between machines.
These standards can be much stronger. Four-stroke technology is widely
available today in off-road vehicles. In fact, two of the four major
snowmobile manufacturers are already making and promoting four-stroke
machines. Nevertheless, the snowmobile industry pressured the EPA to
issue a weak proposal and has made it clear it will fight even the very
modest pollution controls under consideration.
TAKE ACTION -- Contact the EPA before December 19, 2001 and urge the
agency to:
- Substantially strengthen the proposed standards for snowmobiles in
order to quickly and completely phase-out dirty two-stroke snowmobiles;
- Harmonize proposed standards for dirt bikes with ATVs by requiring
catalytic converters on both machines;
- Use its legal authority to reduce noise pollution from all machines;
- Establish a mandatory, multi-tiered labeling system that gives
consumers easily understandable information about vehicle emissions; and
- Require particle filters on all diesel boats to protect public
health.
Contact Information:
In all comments, reference "Docket A-2000-01."
Send electronic comments
Send written comments to: The Honorable Christine Todd Whitman, c/o
Margaret Borushko, U.S. EPA, National Vehicle and Fuels Emission
Laboratory, 2000 Traverwood, Ann Arbor, MI 48105.