Eye on Green Diamond: Week 2

By Kerul Dyer
Monday, February 1st, 2010

GDclearcut2Among the trends being born out in Green Diamond’s 2010 Timber Harvest Plans so far, the use of the over sized clearcuts proves most glaring.  So far in 2010, Green Diamond has filed five THP’s containing seven oversized clearcut units.  The Forest Practice Rules restrict the size of clearcuts to 20 acres for ground-based yarding, and 30 acres for cable or other yarding system.  Green Diamond may however propose over-sized units if justified in the plan and approved by Cal Fire during  THP Review.

THP 1-10-001 in Maple Creek proposes Unit B as an oversized clearcut of 23 acres ground-based yarding.  This plan was approved on 3/26/2010 by CalFire with the oversized unit included as proposed.

THP 1-10-011 in the Headwaters of Little River proposes two oversized clearcut units.  Unit A proposes 22 acres of ground-based clearcut, while Unit D proposes 21 acres of ground-based clearcut.  Green Diamond justifies these oversized units by potentially utilizing the option of shovel yarding.  However, shovel yarding is still classified as a ground-based yarding operation in the rules, thus these units are oversized.  This plan is currently open for public comment.

THP 1-10-014 in the Headwaters of Little River proposes Unit B as a 33-acre ground-based yarding clearcut.  This giant ground-based clearcut unit constitutes over a third of the 88 total clearcut acres proposed in this plan.  This plan is still open to public comment.

THP 1-10-016 sits on Berry Ridge above the Mad River.  This plan contains two oversized clearcut units.  Unit A is a 22.5 acre tractor yarded clearcut.  Unit C is a 28 acre tractor yarded clearcut.  These units comprise 50 of the 59 total clearcut acres under this plan.  This plan is still open to public comment.

THP 1-10-017 in Maple Creek proposes Unit  C as  a 31.5 acre oversized clearcut to be yarded either by cable or shovel.  In either case, the unit is oversized.  This unit comprises more than a third of the total 77.7 acres of clearcutting proposed in this plan.  This plan is still open to public comment.

These oversized, mostly ground-based clearcut units pose a threat not only to water quality in the various watersheds, but also threatend to continue the Green Diamond trend of voraciously fragmenting the landscape.  Also these oversized clearcuts act to wipe out larger swaths of actual and potential habitat for species of concern in those watersheds, including Northern Spotted Owls, Pacific Fisher, and others.

Please comment to Cal Fire on these THP’s.  Let Cal Fire kow that clearcutting, and particularly oversized clearcutting is the most potentially damaging logging alternative available to Green Diamond. Tell Cal Fire to enforce the clearcut unit size limitations on all Green Diamond THP’s.

For comments, please email CalFire at santarosapubliccomment@fire.ca.gov.

Tags: , ,

8 Comments so far

…I have a feeling some slick slimy people have a slick and slimy plan…that involves lots of big trucks…and money for their pockets…the Redwood Highway will not be the same peaceful road that we know it as…we must defeat this stupid plan…to put this grove in jeopardy is totally unacceptable!

Comment by Seth 02.12.10 @ 4:10 pm

It’s utterly insane to have 101 still going through the heart of the Richardson Grove, let alone widen it! Surely, a by-pass route
can be worked out. This magnificent grove of Redwood cannot
be sacrificed.

Comment by Ted Roberts 02.12.10 @ 7:07 pm

Respect the community that doesn’t want to cut these big trees to make a faster road through an ancient grove of redwoods. Slow down and use those funds to maintain roads.

Comment by robin mcblaine 02.14.10 @ 10:00 pm

Questions? How will the increased hazard to the often significant, amount of pedestrian traffic be mitigated?

Comment by Jessie Wheeler 02.16.10 @ 11:54 am

question? What, precisely, will be the benefit of this widening in dollars and cents, What are the names of the individuals and or business That will profit from this job?
How, exactly, will that mitigate the damage to the Park?

What will be the increase in the noise level, inconvenience and general disturbance be for campers enjoying the peaceful beauty of the redwoods.

Comment by Jessie Wheeler 02.16.10 @ 12:00 pm

Thehre must be another alternate route through the park, even if it means building a bridge across the Eel River. Those ancient tall trees are a big part of the Parks attraction and need to be saved for all of us and future generations.

Comment by Carol Woods 02.17.10 @ 10:50 am

We live in Oregon, and we have lots of pretty places, but none as beautiful as the redwoods of Richardson Grove. Please fight to save it.

Comment by Barbara and Kraig 02.17.10 @ 11:49 am

hello treelovers
I have been years ago along the 101 road and the magnificent sequoias !
As a professional photographer of venerable trees, it is so important to preserve them, all of them, so many destructions on our earth, so please STOP ! and drive cool.
regards
Jerome

Comment by Hutin Jerome 02.18.10 @ 2:18 pm

Leave a comment

(required)

(required)